Faculty Affairs

Providing overall coordination for faculty-related personnel matters

Regents’ Teaching Excellence Awards for Department or Program


Nomination portfolios are limited to 20 pages, including any appendices (1” margins, minimum 12-point font). Therefore, incorporating every kind of evidence will be impossible. Instead, each department or program will want to select only the strongest and most relevant evidence.

An electronic copy of the full portfolio is due by email no later than December 4, 2017. All documents for the nomination packet are required to be combined into a SINGLE pdf file with the following naming convention: Institution_ Department or Program (e.g. USG_History or USG_Student Success) Mail nomination portfolio pdf to Faculty Resources.


The award committee will look for persuasive evidence that nominated departments or programs promote, support, and recognize excellence in teaching and in service to students. The kinds of evidence sought are illustrated by the following examples:

  • Individual and collective faculty efforts to improve teaching and student learning.
  • Methods of assessment of student learning, achievements that go beyond student evaluations, and the use of assessment results to inform teaching practices, and curriculum development and revision.
  • Active support to enable faculty to use innovative and effective forms of pedagogy and technology (e.g., critical thinking, collaborative learning, cooperative learning, problem-based learning, learning communities, etc.).
  • Strong links between good teaching and various rewards (e.g., compensation, promotion, tenure, grants, leaves, travel, departmental or program-based awards, etc.).
  • Department/unit policies that encourage collaborative faculty efforts, including team teaching, teaching discussion groups, common assessments, interdisciplinary courses, learning communities, mentoring, etc.
  • An on-going and data-driven process for reviewing and reshaping curricula so that achieving academic excellence and serving the needs of all students remain as top priorities.
  • Exemplary programs for advising, mentoring, recruiting, and retaining students; co-curricular work with students; out-of-class learning.
  • Success of the department’s or program’s students (e.g., graduation, job placement, acceptance in graduate school, etc.).
  • Clear articulation of how quality is defined, promoted, and assessed by the department or program.

Required Documentation

  • A Table of Contents for the portfolio. NOTE: The TOC does not count toward the maximum of 20 pages.
  • A nomination letter from the institution’s chief academic officer (1-2 pages, 1” margins, minimum 12-point font).
  • A narrative statement from the department or program that outlines its philosophy as a community of faculty, and its goals and strategies for making a difference in the academic success of students. This statement should address the criteria for the award (2-3 pages, 1” margins, minimum 12-point font).
  • A one-page fact profile for the department or program.
  • Data showing student success such as graduation rates, student retention, job placement, acceptance to other schools, etc.
  • A concise, clear, and well-organized collection of evidence that details the department’s or program’s distinctive efforts to foster good teaching and therefore student learning. Suggestions for the kinds of evidence that might be included in this collection are found in the award criteria. These documents should be accompanied by a brief explanation of why they are included in the dossier, i.e., how they document the excellence of the department’s teaching.

Note: All documents must be combined into a SINGLE pdf file and submitted by email. Portfolios that exceed 20 pages or do not meet formatting requirements will not be accepted