Main Navigation

Meeting Minutes: Regents Advisory Committee on Accounts Receivable (RACAR)

PRE-RACAR

Date of Meeting: December 11, 2003
Location: Macon State College-Bldg C, Room 112, Educ. Tech. Center
Attendees: Attachment A

The pre-RACAR meeting was an informal discussion group and demonstration of various components of Banner facilitated by Rich Loftus.

Agenda Items

Banner TRA Reporting
Debbie Powell from Georgia Southern University led discussions on Banner TRA Reporting. She reported that the BETA testing overall went very well. Institutions not already working on set-up should start getting ready to report for January 2004. A show of hands asking who outsourced their TRA and who did theirs in-house resulted in 16 outsourced and 9 did theirs in-house.

Banner Fee Assessment
Carol Payne from Georgia Tech discussed Banner Fee Assessment in version 5.6 of Student. She reported that there were numerous defects that she feels could be resolved; currently however, not all have been fixed. Running fee assessment in batch during business hours at GIT locked up key Banner system components. Carol mentioned that SCT resolution to this issue was to not run batch fee assessment during normal business hours. Carol stated this is not acceptable because at GIT the hours of operation are as close to 24/7 as possible.

TIV Refund Processing
Donja Tripp from GA SW State University led a discussion on TIV processing. She provided Title IV handouts, which can be accessed at: http://www.usg.edu/oiit/summit/2003/agenda/proceedings/r2t4_summit2003.pdf

Currently 3 institutions are running Banner Title IV:

  • Georgia State University
  • Georgia Southwestern University
  • Gordon College

Rich Loftus led a discussion on a GaMOD for refunding which expands the percentage field on form SFAESTS from 3 to 5. (Example 100 to 100.00) Rich asked the schools how many understood the effects of the enhancement OIIT delivers. Maintenance on this modification is costly, both in dollars and in personal testing time. Karen Nunn reported that the enhancement would be delivered through the release of student 6.1. Rich mentioned that he would like schools to evaluate the need for this enhancement, and mentioned that in contacting SCT, they do not have plans to expand this field in Baseline.

Non-Student Receivables
Rich Loftus conducted a presentation on non-student receivables in Banner. Attendees where offered an opportunity to understand the capabilities of Banner for non-student receivables. A discussion was held regarding the Systems direction in this area. Institutions where advised that at this time, no decision has been made, but the System is looking at Banner as the model sole receivable system. Institutions interested in moving toward Banner as the sole receivable system where asked to proceed with caution, and to make sure they notified OIIT in writing to Karen Nunn karen.nunn@usg.edu and Rich Loftus rich.loftus@usg.edu or Cori Loftis 404/657-1830 cori.loftis@usg.edu prior to moving in this direction.

PS Reconciliation Information
Rich also led a discussion on Banner to PS Reconciliation Information (Audit Scripts & TGRRCON). ZAQFDTL and ZAQFREC scripts were both delivered. ZAQFDTL provides a listing of all students with open balances that should equate to the TGRRCON report in total when run at the same time. ZAQFREC is a listing of data feeds to PS by account number. In other words, this is the information that the Banner system feels it passed to the PS system. Rich described how these reports use a view of information to compile the required data. The view that is created is ZGVRCON. This view can be used to develop ad-hoc or customized reports. Persons with proper security access can use this view (ZGVRCON) using standard ODBC compliant reporting tools such as Crystal, etc. The view is automatically created when either ZAQFDTL and ZAQFREC are run. For more information on the Auditing Toolkit and scripts visit http://www.usg.edu/oiit/eas/sfa/5doc/docpdf/5x2003/gamods/gamods5123udocch16audit.pdf

Minutes of Pre-RACAR meeting provided by Cori Loftis and Rich Loftus.

RACAR

Meeting Minutes

Date of Meeting: December 12, 2003 Time: 10:00am to 1 p.m.
Location: Macon State College-Bldg C, Room 112, Educ. Tech. Center
Attendees: Attachment A

Agenda Items

1. Adoption of By-Laws

This was the inaugural meeting of the Regents Advisory Committee on Accounts Receivable. The bylaws were unanimously approved by committee members. The bylaws are included in this document as attachment B.

2. Election of Officers

The following officers were elected:

Chairman Donja Tripp, Director of Student Accounts
Georgia Southwestern State University
Americus, GA
Phone: 229-931-2013
Email: donja@canes.gsw.edu
Vice Chairman Debbie Powell, Director of Revenue Accounting
Georgia Southern University
Statesboro, GA
Phone: 912-871-1265
Email: dpowell@georgiasouthern.edu
Secretary Holley Schramski, Director of Bursar's Division
University of Georgia
Athens, GA
Phone: 706-542-2727
Email: hschrams@uga.edu

The committee requested that a Fee Assessment Demo be put together. Cori Loftis was introduced to those in attendance. Cori is Administrative Assistant responsible for communications involving the GaBEST project. Cori will set up and maintain an Accounts Receivable List Serve for use by RACAR.

3. Discussion Topics

Multi-Institutional Functionality (MIF)
MIF will allow students to register at their home institution for other institution's courses. The home school will assess fees and then institutions will coordinate an exchange funds between institutions.

The MIF fee assessment committee advised that students should pay:

  1. the tuition/applicable fees for courses registered at the home institution plus
  2. the applicable standard rate per credit hour for the courses at the host institution (there will be a standard rate per credit hour for each level of institution) plus a standard fee for MIF cost recovery.

The 12 hour cap would not apply to the transient hours assessed at the host rate. The pilot phase begins in Fall 2004, pilot institutions have yet to be identified.

MIF project information can be found in the OIIT project management site, SITCAP, http://www.usg.edu/usgweb/sitcap/ For access to more detailed information on this site, log into site using guest as both the username and access code.

The goal of MIF is student service; i.e. one bill, one place for the student to pay.

The GSFC is willing to adjust HOPE transient procedures to award and disburse HOPE from the Home institution. Currently HOPE is awarded and disbursed by the Host institution.

Other MIF attendance issues not yet resolved:

  • Head Count (Who gets it?)
  • Credit Count (Who gets it?)

It will be an institutional decision about the number of hours a student can take as a transient.

Other states using the MIF concept with SCT software: Illinois, Hawaii community colleges, and Connecticut (online consortium).

HOPE Invoicing
(Prior to the actual discussion on HOPE invoicing, there was discussion about the proposed HOPE changes. It is proposed that the HOPE award be reduced by the amount of fees and book allowance. There was some discussion about potential "grandfathering" of the changes. Student Financial Aid Directors ask that current fees and books not be grand fathered because of the record-keeping burden. Furthermore, there was concern about the timing of the legislature's decision on HOPE changes. Perhaps now that RACAR has organized, communication with GSFC would be in order to inform GSFC of the ramifications of delays in the legislature's decision. For example, if HOPE is reduced by fees and book allowance effective with summer 2004 terms, some schools have summer terms that begin in May. If the decision was not made until after May, there is a potential that schools would have to ask students for repayment.)

Starting with Spring '04, two pilot schools, Kennesaw State and Dalton State, will electronically invoice GSFC listing each student and the detailed amounts of tuition/fees/books. All schools are required to follow the invoicing process beginning with Fall '04. GSFC will return the file of the invoice and wire the funds within 48 hours. Specifications for the file layout have already been produced and OIIT will release the pilot HOPE invoicing enhancement around December 19 for the pilot schools.

Reconciliation will be required on a semester by semester basis.

Schools need to coordinate internally between the business office and the financial aid office regarding the timing of transmission of the invoice and the delivery of the funds, determine the frequency of invoicing, etc.

AR Data Collection
An update on the USG123 data-warehousing project as it relates to AR was provided. Institutions where informed that the USG123 development team would start AR Data Collection with collection of fee waivers. The universities are reminded that a separate waiver code (detail code) is required for each fee waiver listed in USG policy. The USG policy on Finance and Business can be viewed at http://www.usg.edu/regents/policymanual/700.phtml.

Discussion grew from the topic of fee waiver data regarding the reconciliation between AR data and accounting information-what if the waiver information from the AR data warehouse does not match the same information in the accounting data warehouse? The data warehouse might have fewer codes than the school will have and therefore a cross-walk of data would be required.

Another example of use for the data warehouse is information about scholarships from outside agencies, such as Chik-Fil-A scholarships. Committee members explained that there could be potential problems with data on outside scholarships since each school processes these scholarships differently; i.e. some schools do not retain in AR, the detail down to the specific scholarship name.

The eventual goal is to link all the data between AR, Financial Aid, Financial Accounting, and Student systems. Some committee members expressed concern about duplication of data between AR and Financial Aid... at what point would a reconciliation process be required?

In the future there could be some benefit to and AR data warehouse in that schools could prepare scholarship allowance reports from the data warehouse.

Accounts Receivable Reporting Needs - 3rd party agreements

Touchnet
The USG is trying to facilitate better pricing and provide services that would meet the needs of all the system schools. Currently six schools use the Touchnet payment gateway for internet credit card processing. The schools are pleased with Touchnet. Touchnet also provides a web-based check processing system. Touchnet is working on the ability to "host" credit card information for schools so that the credit card numbers are not stored in the school's system. Touchnet would retain the liability. For more information on TouchNet, visit http://www.touchnet.com/.

Higher One
This company offers refunding to students. Schools transmit a file of the students and amounts to be refunded and Higher One makes the disbursement. Tamara Lane at the State University of West Georgia mentioned that SUWG has contracted with Higher One and that they have successfully sent test files to Higher One. SUWG plans to go live with this process spring '04. Rita Adams at Kennesaw State University mentioned that KSU has also contracted with Higher One to assist in the refunding of student balances. For more information on Higher One visit http://www.higherone.com/.

Under this system, the student makes the choice on the Higher One website how the funds will be disbursed to the student. Higher One will issue a paper check if student requests otherwise the refund will go to the student's Higher One card. Parents can go to a website and put additional money on the student's card. Higher One also does ACH processing for schools.

Higher One has represented to some schools that the BOR is going to buy it - NOT THE CASE.

One school expressed concerns about reconciliations and audits when you would use a service such as Higher One.

Payment Plans
The University of Georgia asked if there was any interest from schools to re-visit using payment plans such as AMS or TMS especially given the rising costs of tuition/fees, housing, food plans and the proposed changes to limit the HOPE award. There was not any interest from other schools. One institution uses an emergency loan to students in lieu of a payment plan. Under this arrangement, students must pay 50% of charges plus a $25 processing fee. The balance is due in 45 days and if not paid, student's schedule is canceled. This is very limited in its use at this institution. Rich Loftus said he will ask Bill Bowes if there has been any movement on this since it was last discussed 3-5 years ago.

Rich Loftus requested schools to send him their "third party" needs, not only for credit card, but other needs such as "web check", "ACH" etc.

Other Discussion
Documentation for next version of Banner will be on the GA Best website. Rich Loftus will also see about creating a link to Basic Banner Overview and other Banner information from the website.

We will attempt to coincide the spring RACAR meeting with the Financial Aid (RACFA) and Registrar (RACRA) groups. Their next meeting is scheduled to be at Georgia Tech in early March.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:00 p.m.

Minutes submitted by Holley Schramski, Secretary.

[ return to top ]

Attachment A - Meeting Attendees

Institutions Contact Name Email Address Phone
Abraham Baldwin Agricultural Cam Reagin creagin@abac.peachnet.edu 229/386-3642
Albany State Loraine Leary
Linda Smiley
lleary@asurams.edu
lrsmiley@asurams.edu
229/430-4615
229/430-6441
Armstrong Atlantic State Susan Norton nortonsu@mail.armstrong.edu 912/921-7352
Atlanta Metropolitan College James Altemus jaltemus@atlm.edu 404/756-4359
Augusta State Barbara Stewart bdstewar@aug.edu 706/737-1769
Bainbridge College Kay Owens kowens@bainbridge.edu 229/243-6439
Clayton College & State Linda Stanford lindastanford@mail.clayton.edu 770/961-3601
Coastal Georgia Community Jeff Preston preston@cgcc.edu 912/262-2335
Columbus State Bert Lyman lymanalbert@colstate.edu 706/569-3438
Dalton State Wanda Aldridge waldridge@em.daltonstate.edu 706/272-4435
Darton College Stan Brown browns@darton.edu 229/430-6721
East Georiga College Linda Attebery lattebery@ega.edu 478/289-2005
Floyd College Wayne Jones wjones@floyd.edu 706/295-6344
Fort Valley State Eula Solomon solomone@mail.fvsu.edu 478/825-6302
Gainesville College Debbie Pilgram dpilgram@gc.peachnet.edu 770/718-3731
Georgia College & State Wanda Ennis wanda.ennis@gcsu.edu 478/445-6094
Georgia Perimeter College Van Hope vhope.gpc.edu 404/244-5023
Georgia Southern Debbie Powell dpowell@GeorgiaSouthern.edu 912/871-1265
Georgia Southwestern Donja Tripp donja@canes.gsw.edu 229/931-2013
Georgia State Susan Crosier scrosier@gsu.edu 404/651-1278
Georgia Tech Carol Payne carol.payne@business.gatech.edu 404/894-5596
Gordon College Jackie Lovejoy jackiel@gdn.edu 770/358-5010
Kennesaw State Rita Adams radams@kennesaw.edu 770/423-6419
Macon State Caroll Ferrell cferrell@mail.maconstate.edu 478/471-5352
Medical College of Georgia Beth Welsh bwelsh@mcg.edu 706/721-6024
Middle Georgia College Gretchen Horne ghorne@mgc.peachnet.edu 478/934-3447
North Georgia College & State Dana Turner dturner@ngcsu.edu 706/864-1408
Savannah State Janice Allen allenj@savstate.edu 912/353-3044
South Georgia College Donna Ross dross@sga.edu 912/389-4227
Southern Polytechnic State David Ballentine dballent@spsu.edu 770/528-6828
State Univ of West Georgia Tamara Lane tlane@westga.edu 770/836-6785
University of Georgia Holley Schramski hschrams@uga.edu 706/542-1625
Valdosta State Tracyee Martin tmartin@valdosta.edu 229/245-4394
Waycross College Debbie Meeks debmeeks@waycross.edu 912/285-6107

return to top